Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2025

FRAND Developments In The Unified Patent Court: Where Do We Stand?

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Contributor
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Our clients are increasingly operating in South-East Asia and require legal assistance in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

On 22 November 2024, in a case between Panasonic and OPPO, the Mannheim Local Division (LD) of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) handed down the first ever full-fledged substantive decision on the licensing of standard essential patents (SEPs) on Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) terms...

NetherlandsIntellectual Property

On 22 November 2024, in a case between Panasonic and OPPO, the Mannheim Local Division (LD) of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) handed down the first ever full-fledged substantive decision on the licensing of standard essential patents (SEPs) on Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) terms. The UPC had already dealt with FRAND cases in the context of procedural orders. Below we provide a brief overview of these developments, which are relevant to both SEP holders and implementers.

LD Mannheim decision

This case is part of a large patent enforcement campaign by Panasonic against OPPO and Xiaomi that started in 2023, with Panasonic invoking several SEPs relating to the 3G and 4G telecom standards. In the court's decision, which deals with one of the patents invoked (EP 2 568 724), the LD Mannheim ruled in favour of patentee Panasonic and granted an injunction.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from