Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 SEPTEMBER 2026

Amsterdam District Court Renders Interim Judgment In International Anti-SLAPP Dispute

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The Amsterdam District Court has issued a significant interim judgment in a cross-border anti-SLAPP dispute between Greenpeace International and a U.S. energy company, examining whether Dutch courts can exercise jurisdiction over alleged strategic litigation initiated in the United States. The ruling addresses critical questions about the retroactive application of the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive, jurisdictional grounds under existing tort law, and the interplay between parallel proceedings in different

NetherlandsEnvironment

On June 3, 2026, the Amsterdam District Court ("the Court") rendered an interim judgment ("the Judgment") in the ongoing anti-SLAPP dispute between Greenpeace International ("GI") and a U.S.-based energy company ("the Company"). A SLAPP refers to "strategic litigation against public participation": proceedings alleged to be brought not primarily to assert legal rights, but to limit a public participant's (such as NGOs, journalists, and academics) participation in the public debate. The new EU Anti-SLAPP Directive ("the Directive") seeks to protect persons and entities engaging in public participation against manifestly unfounded or abusive proceedings. 

The Judgment relates to U.S. litigation commenced by the Company against GI, concerning GI's protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. In that U.S. litigation, GI was ordered to pay approximately USD 345 million in damages to the Company, following which GI announced it would appeal this decision.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from