1. Key takeaways
The court established a confidentiality club under Rule
262A RoP for documents preserved in the preservation of evidence
containing confidential information.
Content 1
Access was granted to the applicant's
representatives, one external technical advisor (bound by
professional confidentiality rules), and a designated individual
from the applicant company (Rule 262A.6 RoP).
The Court did not follow the request to limit access for
representatives referring to the order UPC_CFI_181/2024 (LD
Düsseldorf) of July 15, 2024. A representative is free to
involve members of his/her team, who are actively involved in the
proceedings.
It denied the request to allow access for an unlimited number of
unspecified external technical advisors and limited access to one
technical advisor (which was deemed sufficiend for the technical
complexity of this specific case). It required that this external
technical advisor be named before access (to assess