Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 MARCH 2016

Not Just Another English Decision On Break Clauses

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Contributor
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Managing Partner: Will Carmody Chair: Philip Nolan Number of partners: 124 Languages: French,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

The decision in the case Marks and Spencer Plc. v. BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company Ltd. is of significant interest to landlords and tenants in relation to the interpretation of commercial lease provisions.

IrelandReal Estate and Construction

A court will not rewrite a freely negotiated lease, even if the outcome appears unfair. In a recent court case involving Marks and Spencer, the tenant was not entitled to a refund of rent paid in advance where payment occurred shortly before the lease break option date. The lease was silent on the point. The case, from England’s highest court, emphasises the importance of clearly setting out your expectations in the lease.

The decision in the case Marks and Spencer Plc. v. BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company Ltd. 1 is of significant interest to landlords and tenants in relation to the interpretation of commercial lease provisions. Generally, the lesson is to make terms explicit. As the March Hare said “you should say what you mean”.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from