Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 NOVEMBER 2020

To Interrogate Or Not To Interrogate?

William Fry LLP
William Fry LLP
Contributor
William Fry LLP

William Fry LLP

William Fry advises leading Irish and international companies, covering both the public and private...

View firm profile
Explore more from William Fry LLP

The High Court recently gave judgment in an application for the delivery of interrogatories in a personal injuries action.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The High Court recently gave judgment in an application for the delivery of interrogatories in a personal injuries action. The plaintiff's underlying claim is for damages for personal injuries allegedly arising from the administration to him of the swine flu vaccine.

The plaintiff brought an application for an order pursuant to Order 31, Rule 1 of the Rules of the Superior Court requesting leave to deliver interrogatories on a number of the defendants. The parties came to an agreement on all but one of the interrogatories which was addressed to the fourth named defendant, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (GlaxoSmithKline) who had developed the vaccine at issue in the case. The interrogatory in contention related to analysis of adverse events associated with two swine flu vaccines produced by GlaxoSmithKline (proposed interrogatory).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from