Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 OCTOBER 2017

Penalty Clauses – Recent Supreme Court View

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Contributor
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Managing Partner: Will Carmody Chair: Philip Nolan Number of partners: 124 Languages: French,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Parties to a contract often agree that, in the event of a breach, the party that has committed the breach must pay the other party a specified sum of money.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

What is a penalty clause?

Parties to a contract often agree that, in the event of a breach, the party that has committed the breach must pay the other party a specified sum of money. However, that sum may be deemed a penalty by the courts if it breaks the common law rule on penalties. The rule against penalties and the unenforceability of penalty clauses originated in courts which sought to prevent exploitation of borrowers during a time when credit was not as easily accessible as it is today and borrowers were particularly vulnerable.

Supreme Court judgment

Launceston Property Finance Limited v Burke [2017] IESC 62 (Burke) involved an appeal by a married couple of a decision and subsequent order of the High Court for the possession of two properties by Anglo Irish Bank. The couple had entered into a number of loan transactions on which they defaulted. The loans were secured against the repossessed properties in question. The borrowers appealed on four grounds.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from