Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MAY 2026

Judicial Guidance On AI Use In Litigation

The Irish Court of Appeal has established groundbreaking principles governing artificial intelligence use in legal proceedings, addressing the risks of AI-generated hallucinations and fabricated case citations. What obligations do litigants and lawyers now face when leveraging AI tools for legal research, and what sanctions might courts impose for non-compliance with these new guidelines?

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In its recent decision in Guerin v O’Doherty [2026] IECA 48 (“Guerin”), the Irish Court of Appeal set out general principles for the use of AI in litigation. The court stressed that all parties to litigation (whether legally represented or not) have an obligation not to mislead the court by relying on fabricated authorities or unsupported propositions.  The judgment highlights some of the risks associated with the use of generative AI in conducting litigation.

Hallucination risk and impact

The defendant (a litigant in person) used AI to prepare their written submissions. This resulted in the submissions referencing authorities that did not exist, as a result of so-called “hallucinations”. The court observed these types of issues should be expected, given the nature of large language model (“LLM”) artificial intelligence systems.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from