Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JUNE 2014

Is ATE Insurance About To Change The Litigation Landscape In Ireland?

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Contributor
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Managing Partner: Will Carmody Chair: Philip Nolan Number of partners: 124 Languages: French,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

On 5 June 2014 Judge Hogan of the Irish High Court held that a "plaintiff’s ATE insurance policy does not amount to either maintenance or champerty".

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Greenclean Waste Management Ltd v Maurice Leahy p/a Maurice Leahy & Co Solicitors

On 5 June 2014 Judge Hogan of the Irish High Court1 held that a "plaintiff's ATE insurance policy does not amount to either maintenance or champerty". This brief statement could have a significant impact on the future of litigation in Ireland.

Background

After the Event ("ATE") insurance is generally provided by the insurance industry to cover a plaintiff's potential exposure to his opponent's legal costs if the plaintiff loses either litigation or arbitration and is ordered to pay his opponent's legal costs. As such, it protects plaintiffs from this potential exposure in return for a premium. The premium is usually only payable if the plaintiff is successful. As the name suggests, the person or company takes out the policy "after the event" which gives rise to the claim has occurred.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from