Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MAY 2025

High Court Rules Barristers Cannot Directly Accept Client Instructions In Litigation

Addleshaw Goddard
Addleshaw Goddard
Contributor
Addleshaw Goddard

Addleshaw Goddard

Addleshaw Goddard is a global law firm trusted by over 3,000 major organisations, including 51 FTSE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Addleshaw Goddard

In a recent judgment, the High Court restated a long-standing principle that barristers may not accept instructions directly from clients in litigation related matters. With certain exceptions, barristers in litigation...

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a recent judgment, the High Court restated a long-standing principle that barristers may not accept instructions directly from clients in litigation related matters. With certain exceptions, barristers in litigation matters must be briefed by a solicitor. The court took the opportunity to review the relevant codes, by which barristers were regulated and emphasised the source of the restriction upon barristers being directly briefed by the public. In the context of professional regulation, this judgment illustrates that the courts will analyse codes and rules, of particular professions, when necessary and will rely on such codes and rules to determine issues in disputes.

In a recent decision of the High Court in Mallon .v. The Minister for Justice and Ors [2025] IEHC 125, the court considered an application challenging the restriction on a litigant's entitlement to brief a barrister directly, instead of through the prescribed method of first retaining a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from