Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MAY 2025

Four Sets Of Defamation Proceedings To Be Heard Simultaneously

William Fry LLP
William Fry LLP
Contributor
William Fry LLP

William Fry LLP

William Fry advises leading Irish and international companies, covering both the public and private...

View firm profile
Explore more from William Fry LLP

The defendants argued that there was a substantial overlap of evidence, witnesses, issues of law and alleged losses claimed by the plaintiff.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Tracey v Irish Times Limited & Ors, Tracey v Independent Star Limited & Anor, Tracey v Independent Newspapers [Ireland] Limited & Ors, Tracey v Independent Newspapers [Ireland] Limited & Ors [2025] IEHC 221, the defendants brought a motion seeking to have all four sets of proceedings heard simultaneously.

The defendants argued that there was a substantial overlap of evidence, witnesses, issues of law and alleged losses claimed by the plaintiff. They further stated that hearing the proceedings simultaneously would save court time and avoid incurring unnecessary costs.

The plaintiff counterargued that a separate judge and jury should hear each trial. He maintained that while the articles he alleges defamed him were similar, the wording and headlines differed. The plaintiff also emphasised that the four newspapers had different readerships, potentially resulting in varying levels of damages for each claim.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from