Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JANUARY 2014

Expert Evidence: The Importance of Proper Consideration

Maples Group
Maples Group
Contributor
Maples Group

Maples Group

The Maples Group, through its leading international law firm, Maples and Calder, advises global...

View firm profile
Explore more from Maples Group

A recent Privy Council decision looks at how courts must treat the evidence of expert witnesses (Caribbean Steel Co Ltd v Price Waterhouse (A Firm) [2013] UKPC 18).

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A recent Privy Council decision looks at how courts must treat the evidence of expert witnesses (Caribbean Steel Co Ltd v Price Waterhouse (A Firm) [2013] UKPC 18).

In this case the plaintiff ("CSC") acquired a majority shareholding of Caribbean Cable Company Limited ("CCC") for $32m (Jamaican dollars).  Before CSC completed the purchase it obtained a valuation of CCC from Price Waterhouse (auditor of both CSC and CCC) which described a pension fund surplus of $13.85m as an asset of CCC.

Price Waterhouse continued to act as auditor to CSC after the acquisition of CCC.  Fifteen months after the acquisition it emerged that CCC had $1.4m in outstanding borrowings from its pension fund at the time that Price Waterhouse had carried out its valuation, which were not mentioned in the valuation report. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from