Summary
A recent High Court judgement delivered by Mr Justice Michael
Twomey analysed the link between blameworthiness and causation in
ascertaining the impact of the Civil Liability Act 1961 (the
"CLA") on concurrent wrongdoers where a
settlement has been made with one wrongdoer.
The case highlights the dangers that may arise where a
settlement agreement is entered into with one of a number of
parties that contributed to the same loss. The High Court, having
reviewed a number of decisions from other jurisdictions, found,
based on the facts of this case, where there are civil and criminal
wrongdoers in respect of the same loss it will not be just and
equitable for the primary criminal wrongdoer to be entitled to a
contribution from the secondary civil wrongdoer. In this case the
civil wrongdoer was entitled to a full indemnity from the criminal
wrongdoer.