Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JUNE 2021

Caesar's Wife No Longer The Exemplar In Bias Cases?

In Kelly v Minister for Agriculture and Others the Supreme Court quashed the Cabinet's decision to dismiss the applicant from his position as harbour master at Killybegs Fishery Harbour Centre.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Kelly v Minister for Agriculture and Others the Supreme Court quashed the Cabinet's decision to dismiss the applicant from his position as harbour master at Killybegs Fishery Harbour Centre. A Minister (who was also a local TD) was involved in both raising complaints against the applicant and, in the Cabinet decision-making process which followed. This "twin involvement" of the Minister was found by the Supreme Court to constitute objective bias and so the decision to dismiss the civil servant was quashed.

Facts

The applicant was appointed harbour master at the Killybegs Fishery Harbour Centre in 1996. A complaint arose around the applicant providing pilotage services through a company of which he was a director and a 1% shareholder. The Department of the Marine and Natural Resources ("the Department") decided to investigate, appointing the personnel officer of the Department as the investigator in 2004.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This article contains a general summary of developments and is not a complete or definitive statement of the law. Specific legal advice should be obtained where appropriate.

See more popular content from