Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JANUARY 2009

Bodily Injury And The Montreal Convention

Dillon Eustace
Dillon Eustace
Contributor
Dillon Eustace

Dillon Eustace

Dillon Eustace is one of Ireland’s leading law firms focusing on asset management and investment...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dillon Eustace

What constitutes bodily injury for the purposes of recovering compensation under the Montreal Convention is an area of law that has challenged judges and lawyers down through the years and is a topic on which there is a substantial amount of information.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

What constitutes bodily injury for the purposes of recovering compensation under the Montreal Convention is an area of law that has challenged judges and lawyers down through the years and is a topic on which there is a substantial amount of information. This article sets out some of the salient points which govern this area of law with particular emphasis on the law in Ireland.

An Exclusive Cause of Action

A starting point for this article is to understand the principle that the Montreal Convention ("the Convention") provides an exclusive cause of action. This principle was very clearly established by the House of Lords in the landmark English case of Sidhu and others .v. British Airways plc, 1997. Lord Hope in that case held that "The Convention does not purport to deal with all matters relating to contracts of international carriage by air. But in those areas with which it deals - and the liability of the carrier is one of them - the code is

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from