Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2025

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Balancing Public Policy Considerations And The Recognition Of Foreign Judgments

William Fry LLP
William Fry LLP
Contributor
William Fry LLP

William Fry LLP

William Fry advises leading Irish and international companies, covering both the public and private...

View firm profile
Explore more from William Fry LLP

The Supreme Court recently delivered its judgment in Scully v Coucal Limited [2025] IESC 20, finding that the public policy exception to enforcement of foreign judgments under Article 45(1)...

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Supreme Court recently delivered its judgment in Scully v Coucal Limited [2025] IESC 20, finding that the public policy exception to enforcement of foreign judgments under Article 45(1)(a) of Brussels I Regulation (Recast) (Brussels Recast) should be confined to special and exceptional cases.

A Polish judgment obtained by Coucal Limited (Appellant) on foot of an assignment of a bare cause of action, valid under Polish law, was found to be enforceable under Irish law. This was despite the general rule that such an assignment is generally not allowed under Irish law. As discussed in previous William Fry articles, such assignments are regarded as savouring of maintenance and champerty and are therefore unlawful.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from