Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MAY 2022

Proportionate Remedies For Misrepresentation

Dillon Eustace
Dillon Eustace
Contributor
Dillon Eustace

Dillon Eustace

Dillon Eustace is one of Ireland’s leading law firms focusing on asset management and investment...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dillon Eustace

In Tolan v McLaughlin & Greaney Insurances Limited T/A Future & Zurich Insurance PLC, [2022] IECA 27, the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the High Court dismissing the plaintiff's claim against, Future, his insurance brokers, and Zurich Insurance plc.

IrelandInsurance

In Tolan v McLaughlin & Greaney Insurances Limited T/A Future & Zurich Insurance PLC, [2022] IECA 27, the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the High Court dismissing the plaintiff's claim against, Future, his insurance brokers, and Zurich Insurance plc ("Zurich"), his insurers, arising from Zurich's decision to withdraw storm cover retrospectively due to a misrepresentation in the proposal form.

Background

The plaintiff, Mr Tolan, held an insurance policy with Zurich in relation to his farm and buildings. The policy had been placed through Future. In February 2017, Storm Doris damaged the plaintiff's two cattle sheds, which had been insured with Zurich since April 2015. Following notification of a claim to Zurich in relation to storm damage to the sheds, Zurich declined to indemnify the plaintiff. Zurich did not repudiate the policy, instead, Zurich withdrew the storm cover retrospectively from policy inception in relation to the cattle sheds and refunded

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from