Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 AUGUST 2013

Professional Advisors - Generalists Beware The Unknown

In Mehjoo v Harben Barker and another, the defendant accounting firm was sued by an Iranian client for failing to refer him to specialised tax advice for non-domiciles, where such ‘non-domicile’ status carried potentially significant tax advantages for the client.

IrelandInsurance

In Mehjoo v Harben Barker (a firm) and another, the defendant accounting firm was sued by an Iranian client for failing to refer him to specialised tax advice for non-domiciles, where such 'non-domicile' status carried potentially significant tax advantages for the client.  The defendant claimed that it was not obliged to give such tax advice unless expressly asked to do so and that it was not obliged to refer the Plaintiff to a relevant specialist for such advice. 

The defendant argued that its terms of retainer, which dated back to 1999, did not expressly require the defendant to refer its client to a specialist.  The court looked outside the parameters of the express retainer and considered the parties' relationship and dealings over a long period of time.  From this it determined that there was a clear and mutually-accepted understanding that the defendant was at all times required to consider the Plaintiff's tax position and provide appropriate advice, even

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from