Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2016

Regulatory Dawn Raids: Data Protection and Privacy Issues

Maples Group
Maples Group
Contributor
Maples Group

Maples Group

The Maples Group, through its leading international law firm, Maples and Calder, advises global...

View firm profile
Explore more from Maples Group

On 5 April 2016, the High Court (Barrett J) gave judgment in CRH plc and Seamus Lynch v The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission.

IrelandFinance and Banking

On 5 April 2016, the High Court (Barrett J) gave judgment in CRH plc and Seamus Lynch v The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission[1]. The decision is very significant for regulated entities – including those operating in the financial services sector. This is because it deals with issues which can arise where the regulator obtains information in the course of a regulatory inspection which is not necessary for its investigation. The decision also highlights the increasingly complex role of regulated entities as data controllers.

Background

The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (the "Commission") carried out a "dawn raid" at the offices of Irish Cement Limited ("ICL") and CRH plc ("CRH") in connection with an investigation into alleged breaches of competition law. The Commission obtained the entire email account of a senior executive in the CRH group who also had held a position in ICL. The plaintiffs' complaint was that by taking the entire

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from