Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JULY 2017

Proprietary Trading And MiFID II – Do You Need To Be Regulated?

Maples Group
Maples Group
Contributor
Maples Group

Maples Group

The Maples Group, through its leading international law firm, Maples and Calder, advises global...

View firm profile
Explore more from Maples Group

We have all heard stories where firms who are already familiar with regulation are struggling with MiFID II.

IrelandFinance and Banking

We have all heard stories where firms who are already familiar with regulation are struggling with MiFID II.  In his speech today (26th July), Michael Hodson highlighted how firms who to date have not been regulated may need to be. 

This is an area we are actively engaged on with a number of clients as the adjustment in moving from an unregulated business to one that is regulated, can be difficult. 

Firms who deal on their own account or undertake algorithmic trading will need to undertake a detailed assessment of their current activity to see if it requires an authorisation under MiFID II.

Additionally, as you will be aware, MiFID II also removes or narrows existing exemptions currently available under MiFID. This is particularly the case for some proprietary traders and other businesses that deal in financial instruments on their own account in the course of an otherwise unregulated business model. The Central Bank has recently issued a warning to firms who

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from