Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 APRIL 2021

Landmark Supreme Court Ruling On WRC

Dillon Eustace
Dillon Eustace
Contributor
Dillon Eustace

Dillon Eustace

Dillon Eustace is one of Ireland’s leading law firms focusing on asset management and investment...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dillon Eustace

The Supreme Court has found, by a narrow majority, that the Workplace Relations Act 2015 (the Act) as implemented by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) is not unconstitutional.

IrelandEmployment and HR

Zalewski v Adjudication Officer & Ors [2021] IESC 24

The Supreme Court has found, by a narrow majority, that the Workplace Relations Act 2015 (the Act) as implemented by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) is not unconstitutional.

WRC Proceedings

The Zalewski case involved proceedings for unfair dismissal and non-payment of wages which were initiated in the WRC. The hearing was adjourned to allow evidence to be given by certain witnesses. However, when the matter returned before the WRC, the applicant was informed that the adjudication officer had already issued a decision dismissing his complaint.

High Court

A judicial review of the WRC process was sought in the High Court. It was alleged that the WRC was engaged in the administration of justice which was required by the Constitution to be within the sole remit of the courts. Further, that the lack of an appeal procedure, the fact that hearings were not held in public and that there was no right to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from