Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JANUARY 2022

The Drone Rules As A Model Approach To Emerging Technology Regulation

Ikigai Law
Explore more from Ikigai Law

In August 2021, the civil aviation ministry notified the Drones Rules 2021 (Drone Rules). These rules completely overhaul an earlier iteration of regulations released only in March, 2021.

IndiaTransport
Anirudh Rastogi
Anirudh Rastogi
Aman Taneja
Aman Taneja
Rahul Krishna
Rahul Krishna
Author LinkedIn connections

Has the government finally cracked the code on regulating emerging technology? The Drone Rules 2021 display maturity and a willingness to receive and act on feedback from the government. In this blogpost, we discuss how the Drone Rules are an example of a forward thinking and permissive regime that could be a model for other emerging technology regulations.

Introduction

In August 2021, the civil aviation ministry notified the Drones Rules 2021 (Drone Rules).  These rules completely overhaul an earlier iteration of regulations released only in March, 2021. The March draft had been seriously criticised by the industry for being overly restrictive. But in the 6 months between the two versions, the ministry displayed a commendable willingness to respond positively and swiftly to industry feedback. The rules are an example of a progressive regime for the regulation of technology. The ministry's approach to drafting the rules should be a model to follow for regulating

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Termination, Recovery & Damages – Lessons From FW Aviation v Vietjet

The dispute in FW Aviation (Holdings) 1 Limited v VietJet Aviation Joint Stock Company1 has been decided through three substantial judgments of the English Commercial Court (“English Court”). Together, they address whether the aircraft leases were validly terminated, sums payable as a result of termination, and the extent to which damages could be claimed for losses arising from the condition, detention and delay in eventual export of the aircraft.
IndiaTransport
Tuli & Co
Tuli & Co
Article

Aircraft Repossession vs Going-Concern Value: How India’s New Insolvency Framework Changes The Position Of Aircraft Lessors

Airline insolvency presents a particularly difficult problem for insolvency law because the assets most critical to keeping the airline operational may not belong to the airline at all. Aircraft are frequently held under operating leases. When an airline enters insolvency, therefore, the resolution professional (“RP”) may be required to preserve the corporate debtor as a going concern while the aircraft lessor seeks to enforce its contractual and international-law rights to recover possession of its aircraft.
IndiaTransport
King, Stubb & Kasiva
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Article

Setting Up An MRO Facility In India

Opening an aircraft maintenance facility in India requires navigating three parallel regulatory tracks that operate on different timelines: airworthiness approval from the DGCA, land and airside access from airport operators, and duty treatment from customs authorities. This comprehensive legal guide examines the statutory framework under the new Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam 2024, the CAR-145 organization approval process, airport land allocation challenges, customs duty exemptions, and the state-level clear
IndiaTransport
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article

Aircraft Maintenance Reserve Clauses That Prevent Costly Redelivery Disputes

Aircraft maintenance reserve clauses and redelivery conditions are the two provisions most likely to trigger multi-million dollar disputes at the end of an aircraft lease agreement. This article examines the mechanics of Maintenance Reserve Funds, explores escrow versus lessor-retained custody structures, and provides detailed guidance on drafting quantified redelivery conditions that eliminate ambiguity when exposure is highest.
IndiaTransport
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants