Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JULY 2025

State Surveillance vs. Privacy Rights: Balancing Security And Liberty In The Digital Age

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

In the modern digital age, state surveillance is an essential tool for governments around the world because of a need to preserve national security and prevent crime, as well as to promote public order and prevent civil unrest.

IndiaPrivacy

Arguments in favor of state surveillance include national security, crime prevention, and public order.

In the modern digital age, state surveillance is an essential tool for governments around the world because of a need to preserve national security and prevent crime, as well as to promote public order and prevent civil unrest. State surveillance, proponents believe, is not only justified but also necessary in dealing with complex challenges from modern threats - threats that include terrorism, cybercrime, and civil unrest. In other words, these arguments depend on the assumption that surveillance is a better capacity for the state in the detection, prevention, and response to threats against society.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from