Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 APRIL 2024

Fact-Check Units: Unchecked Fact Checkers

Majmudar & Partners
Majmudar & Partners
Contributor
Majmudar & Partners

Majmudar & Partners

Majmudar & Partners, established in 1943, is one of India’s premier law firms representing leading...

View firm profile
Explore more from Majmudar & Partners

In the case of Kunal Kamra v. Union of India, on January 31, 2024, the petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of the 2023 amendment (the "2023 Amendment") made to Rule 3...

IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Introduction

In the case of Kunal Kamra v. Union of India, on January 31, 2024, the petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of the 2023 amendment (the "2023 Amendment") made to Rule 3(1)(b)(v) (pertaining to due diligence by an intermediary) (the "Impugned Rule") of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (the "Intermediary Rules"). This update discusses the judgment and analyses its ramifications.

The Intermediary Rules

The Information Technology Act, 2000 (the "IT Act") defines an "intermediary" as any person that, on behalf of another, receives, stores, transmits, or provides services related to electronic records. This includes telecom service providers, network service providers, internet service providers, web-hosting service providers, search engines, online payment sites, online auction sites, online marketplaces, and cyber cafes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from