Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 DECEMBER 2024

Fact-Check Units: An Unchecked Fact Checker – Part II

Majmudar & Partners
Majmudar & Partners
Contributor
Majmudar & Partners

Majmudar & Partners

Majmudar & Partners, established in 1943, is one of India’s premier law firms representing leading...

View firm profile
Explore more from Majmudar & Partners

The Bombay High Court has recently struck down the 2023 amendment to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, which amended Rule 3(1)(b)(v) (pertaining to due diligence by an intermediary) ...

IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

The Bombay High Court has recently struck down the 2023 amendment (the "2023 Amendment") to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (the "Intermediary Rules"), which amended Rule 3(1)(b)(v) (pertaining to due diligence by an intermediary) (the "Impugned Rule") of the Intermediary Rules. The judgment was delivered by Justice Atul Chandurkar, who acted as the third-referral judge, after the division bench of the Bombay High Court delivered a split decision on January 31, 2024 (please find here a detailed analysis of the split decision).

This update discusses the judgment and analyses its implications.

Background

On January 31, 2024, the division bench of Justice GS Patel and Justice Neela Gokhale delivered a split decision in the case of Kunal Kamra v. Union of India. The primary issue before the division bench was the validity of the 2023 Amendment, which took away the immunity ("Safe Harbour") granted

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from