Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 OCTOBER 2015

Two Indian Parties Opting For Foreign-Seated Arbitration: No Bar?

This judgment interprets the scheme of the Act, whereby it clarifies that applicability of Part II of the Act is not based on the nationality of the parties but on the basis of where the arbitration is "seated".

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Nishith Desai Associates
Nishith Desai Associates
Author LinkedIn connections
  • Madhya Pradesh High Court upholds arbitration agreement mandating two Indian Parties to take recourse to a foreign-seated arbitration with foreign substantive law;
  • Holds that the resultant award would be a 'foreign award', as envisaged under Part II of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996;
  • This is a step forward in the longstanding debate on whether arbitration proceedings between two Indian entities can be seated in a foreign country.

Background

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ("Court") in its recent decision in Sasan Power Ltd v. North America Coal Corporation India Pvt Ltd1 has held that two Indian parties may conduct arbitration in a foreign seat under English law.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from