Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 NOVEMBER 2019

Roger Mathew v. South Indian Bank Limited & Ors

Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Contributor
Khaitan & Co.

Khaitan & Co.

Founded in 1911, Khaitan & Co is a heritage law firm that has been a trusted adviser to leading...

View firm profile
Explore more from Khaitan & Co.

The Learned Judge has also recommended the composition of the said Commission.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
  1. By its judgment dated 13 November 2019 in Civil Appeal No. 8588 of 2019 titled "Roger Mathew v. South Indian Bank Limited & Ors" and other connected matters the Supreme Court has dealt with and decided the constitutionality of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017 and the Rules made thereunder.
  2. The core issues before the Supreme Court were as follows:
    1. Whether the Finance Act, 2017 (the Finance Act) satisfies the test of a Money Bill under Article 110 of the Constitution of India?
    2. Whether Section 184 of the Finance Act is unconstitutional on account of excessive delegation of power to the Executive?
    3. Whether Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and Other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience and Other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2017 (Rules) are in consonance with the parent enactments and various decisions of the Supreme Court on the functioning of Tribunals?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this document does not necessarily reflect the views / position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up, please contact Khaitan & Co at [email protected].

See more popular content from