Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JULY 2022

Resolving The "Existential" Crisis Of Section 11 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act

Kachwaha & Partners
Kachwaha & Partners
Contributor
Kachwaha & Partners

Kachwaha & Partners

Founded in 2002, Kachwaha & Partners is a multi-discipline, full service law firm with its main...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kachwaha & Partners

The seemingly innocuous use of the term ‘existence' in Section 11(6A) of the Indian Arbitration Act has been the subject of intense interpretative debates.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kachwaha & Partners
Kachwaha & Partners
Author LinkedIn connections

Abstract

The seemingly innocuous use of the term 'existence' in Section 11(6A) of the Indian Arbitration Act has been the subject of intense interpretative debates. This essay seeks to analyze the jurisprudence that has developed in relation to this 'existence test', by relying on the principles of Kompetenz Kompetenz and party autonomy in arbitration. To do so, it examines the various provisions of Indian Commercial Laws and International Practices to determine the most appropriate application of Section 11. In conclusion, it advocates for having party autonomy as the boundary line for the application of the doctrine of Kompetenz-Kompetenz in the Indian arbitration framework, and how this principle should figure into the framework after the 2019 amendment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from