Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MARCH 2026

Dispute Resolution And ADR - Newsletter - March 2026

The March 2026 edition of Fox & Mandal's Dispute Resolution & ADR Newsletter analyses the 3-fold test to determine which procedural orders can be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; ...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The March 2026 edition of Fox & Mandal's Dispute Resolution & ADR Newsletter analyses the 3-fold test to determine which procedural orders can be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; permissibility of simultaneous insolvency proceedings against the borrower and the guarantor; liability of the landowner for construction delays caused by the developer; power of NCLT cannot review benami property attachment orders; and other recent judgments of the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts.

3-fold test to determine which procedural orders can be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

HS Nag v. Asian Hotels (North) Ltd

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from