Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 AUGUST 2024

Delay And Cost Effectiveness In Arbitration: What The Supreme Court Said

S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices
Contributor
S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices (formerly Singh & Associates) is a full-services law firm comprising of...

View firm profile
Explore more from S&A Law Offices

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bombay Slum Development Corporation Private Limited Vs. Samir Narain Bhojwani has made relevant observations as to whether arbitration ...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bombay Slum Development Corporation Private Limited Vs. Samir Narain Bhojwani1 has made relevant observations as to whether arbitration has been cost effective in India. The Court expressed serious concerns regarding the current trend in conduct of arbitration proceedings and the time and cost issues arising from the same. The observations were made by the Apex Court while deciding upon cross-appeals made by the parties against the order dated 07.07.2023 ("impugned judgement") passed by the division bench of the Bombay High Court (hereinafter referred to as "High Court") in proceedings under Section 37of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "Act"). The judgment was delivered by a division bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court comprising of Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Pankaj Mithal on 08.07.2024.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from