Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 DECEMBER 2018

Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust The Jurisdiction Of Consumer Courts

The appellant (hereinafter referred to as Emaar MGF) is a company which has acquired and purchased land to develop an integrated township in District Mohali, Punjab.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED V. AFTAB SINGH
(REVIEW PETITION (C) Nos. 2629-2630 OF 2018)
(ARISING OUT OF CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 23512-23513 OF 2017)
DATED: 10.12.2018

FACTS

The appellant (hereinafter referred to as Emaar MGF) is a company which has acquired and purchased land to develop an integrated township in District Mohali, Punjab. The respondent (Aftab Singh) was the buyer of a villa in the project of Emaar.

A Buyer's agreement was entered dated 06.05.2008 between Emaar MGF and the respondent. In the Buyer's agreement, there was an arbitration clause providing for settlement of disputes between the parties under the 1996 Act.

When a dispute arose between the parties, the respondent approached NCDRC (National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission) and filed a complaint.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This content is purely an academic analysis under "Legal intelligence series".

© Copyright AMLEGALS.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this document is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal opinion, advice or any advertisement. This document is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or corporate body. Readers should not act on the information provided herein without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the facts and circumstances of a particular situation. There can be no assurance that the judicial/quasi-judicial authorities may not take a position contrary to the views mentioned herein.

See more popular content from