Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JANUARY 2026

AKP Dispute Resolution Digest January 05, 2026

We are delighted to share this month's AKP Dispute Resolution Monthly Digest. Please feel free to write to us with your feedback at [email protected].

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

We are delighted to share this month's AKP Dispute Resolution Monthly Digest. Please feel free to write to us with your feedback at [email protected].

1. Arbitration Law

1.1. Mining and Transportation

1.1.1. Supreme Court rules High Courts cannot re-appreciate evidence or demand strict proof in Section 34 appeal of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

The Supreme Court has held that a High Court, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act"), cannot impermissibly re-appreciate evidence or demand a stricter standard of proof than what arbitration law requires. This ruling came in an appeal by Ramesh Kumar Jain against Bharat Aluminium Company Limited ("BALCO"), challenging the High Court's decision to set aside an arbitral award of INR 3,71,80,584/- (Indian Rupees Three Crore Seventy-one Lakh Eighty Thousand Five Hundred Eighty-four only). The Commercial Court had previously upheld

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from