Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 SEPTEMBER 2008

“Hamdard” Hails Through In Its Infringement Suit

The disputes surrounding pharmaceutical product names or companies are not new to India. Of late, Cadila in a row against three companies using similar names was decided against in an infringement matter.

IndiaIntellectual Property

The disputes surrounding pharmaceutical product names or companies are not new to India. Of late, Cadila in a row against three companies using similar names was decided against in an infringement matter. However, in the case of Hamdard National Foundation v. Abdul Jalil [IA 7385/2004 in CS (OS) 1240/2004] the matter dealt with the use of the name Hamdard by the reverting party with respect to Rice, even though the mark had been registered with respect to the class of products covering the same.

In a suit to prevent infringement of its trademark, copyright and to prevent passing off of its goods, Hamdard National Foundation filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining Abdul Jalil from committing any of these acts. An ad-interim injunction had earlier been granted ex-parte. Hamdard Foundation's trademark in the word "Hamdard" and the visual mark were in contention. The Foundation is registered under the Societies Act, 1860, while Jalil formed a wakf (a trust

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from