Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 FEBRUARY 2023

Update On Madras High Court's Intellectual Property Division

Chapter 19 of the Indian Patents Act, 1970, prescribed that all appeals against the decisions of the Controller of the Indian Patent Office should be heard by the Intellectual Property Appeal Board (IPAB).

IndiaIntellectual Property

Chapter 19 of the Indian Patents Act, 1970, prescribed that all appeals against the decisions of the Controller of the Indian Patent Office should be heard by the Intellectual Property Appeal Board (IPAB). Due to the Board's poor functioning, the Government of India abolished the IPAB under the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021, on April 4, 2021, and directed that all appeals pending and forthcoming shall now be dealt with by the High Courts in India.

In response, the Delhi High Court created its Intellectual Property Division (IPD) to handle original and appellate proceedings, including writ petitions, on July 7, 2021. On October 1, 2021, the IPD released The Delhi High Court Intellectual Property Division Rules, 2021 (DHC-IPD Rules, 2021). Although the Tribunal Reforms Act prescribes the creation of IP Divisions within the High Courts of a jurisdiction, other than the Delhi High Court, no other High Court has formulated

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from