Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 DECEMBER 2024

Navigating The Jurisdictional Divide-Competition Act vs. Patents Act

Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Contributor
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants

Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants

• Full-service law firm established in 2004 by Mr. Vipul Maheshwari, headquartered in New Delhi,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants

The intersection of the Patents Act and the Competition Act has been a subject of debate since long. While patent laws grant inventors exclusive rights

IndiaIntellectual Property
Shruti Dikshit
Shruti Dikshit

The intersection of the Patents Act and the Competition Act has been a subject of debate since long. While patent laws grant inventors exclusive rights to exploit their inventions for a limited period, competition laws aim to promote fair competition and prevent anti-competitive practices. The jurisdictional boundaries between these two frameworks have often been ignored, leading to conflicts and uncertainties.

The dispute originated in a landmark case when two companies, Monsanto, and Ericsson, argued that the authority to investigate anti-competitive licensing of patents lies with either the Controller or the Civil Court as per specific provisions of the Patents Act. Ericsson's involvement with the Competition Commision of India (CCI) arose from accusations of leveraging its market dominance to establish high licensing rates for its standard-essential patents. In a similar vein, Monsanto faced CCI scrutiny for allegedly imposing elevated royalties on

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from