Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JULY 2022

Liability Of Third-Party Developers In Trademark Infringement

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

Recently, SWATCH the Swiss brand for luxury and high-end watches filed a suit for trademark infringement against SAMSUNG. The matter was decided in favor of SWATCH.

IndiaIntellectual Property
Upasna Rana
Upasna Rana
Author LinkedIn connections

Recently, SWATCH the Swiss brand for luxury and high-end watches filed a suit for trademark infringement against SAMSUNG. The matter was decided in favor of SWATCH. But an important question arose before the court, which is, to what extent the app store owners or developers can be held liable for the apps developed by third parties.

  1. INTRODUCTION:

TISSOT, RADO, OMEGA, LONGINES, MIDO, HAMILTON, GLASHÜTE, BREGUET you name a high-end watch brand and SWATCH will most likehttps://www.ipandlegalfilings.com/services/copyright-services/e the owner of it. SWATCH which stands for Swiss Watches is a well-known brand having multiple trademarks, designs, patents, and copyrights registered in its name. In previous years, the company has filed for multiple trademark and patent infringement suits against brands like Tiffany, Bloomberg, Target and so, and has emerged victorious in all. This piece deals with SWATCH's most recent victory against SAMSUNG in a UK court.1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Copy, Right? ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

When an artificial intelligence system is trained on copyrighted news content, and later answers a user’s question using what it learned, has the law been broken? On 24th July 2026, the Delhi High Court answered that question, at least for now. In ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Justice Amit Bansal declined to grant an interim injunction against OpenAI, holding, on a prima facie, interim stage view, that the company’s use of ANI’s news content to train its large language models (“LLMs”) falls within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957
IndiaIntellectual Property
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Amendment Rules, 2026: Enhancing Transparency And Consumer Protection In E-Commerce

The Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Amendment Rules, 2026 introduce significant compliance obligations for e-commerce platforms, particularly regarding the disclosure of Country of Origin and other product information. This article analyses the key amendments, their implications for manufacturers, importers, and online marketplaces, and the broader objectives of strengthening consumer protection in the digital marketplace.
IndiaConsumer Protection
Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Article

Cross-Border Mould And Tooling IP : Protecting Manufacturing Assets In Outsourced Production

A comprehensive legal analysis of intellectual property ownership over moulds, tooling, CAD technical drawings, and product modifications in cross-border outsourced manufacturing. Covers supplier retention risks, unauthorised third-shift runs, ASEAN IP protection strategies for Indian OEMs, and a model supply-contract IP schedule.
IndiaIntellectual Property
Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys