Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 OCTOBER 2025

IPverse: Create. Claim. Control.

CMS INDUSLAW
Explore more from CMS INDUSLAW

The Unauthorised Actors were operating websites "zeptojob.com" and "zeptojobs.in" and falsely presenting themselves as official platforms for recruiting delivery partners.

IndiaIntellectual Property
Bharadwaj Jaishankar
Bharadwaj Jaishankar
Sana Singh
Sana Singh
Trushita Mehra
Trushita Mehra
Ishita Goyal
Ishita Goyal
Author LinkedIn connections

Introduction

We are pleased to share the latest edition of our newsletter, which includes some important developments from the ever-evolving field of Intellectual Property (IP). This quarter has seen notable decisions across trademarks, copyrights, patents, designs, and geographical indications. Courts in India and abroad are beginning to address conflicts that lie at the intersection of copyright and artificial intelligence. The Delhi High Court is considering whether scraping data to train large language models amounts to copyright infringement in ANI v. OpenAI, while the Mexican Supreme Court has held that works generated solely through AI are not eligible for copyright protection. Meanwhile, a proposed settlement is underway in the class action suit filed by several authors against Anthropic, alleging copyright infringement. In the realm of trade mark law, Indian courts have actively curbed fraudulent use of marks to deceive consumers. Both Tata and Zepto have

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Copy, Right? ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

When an artificial intelligence system is trained on copyrighted news content, and later answers a user’s question using what it learned, has the law been broken? On 24th July 2026, the Delhi High Court answered that question, at least for now. In ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Justice Amit Bansal declined to grant an interim injunction against OpenAI, holding, on a prima facie, interim stage view, that the company’s use of ANI’s news content to train its large language models (“LLMs”) falls within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957
IndiaIntellectual Property
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

AI Training Data, Copyright Risk And Commercial Liability: What Businesses Need To Know

On 8 October 2026, USA Today Co. and its affiliated newspaper companies, which publish 19 titles including USA Today, the Detroit Free Press and The Arizona Republic, sued seven OpenAI entities in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that OpenAI copied their journalism to train its models, stripped identifying information from it, and now uses those models to give ChatGPT users summaries that substitute for the original reporting. The publishers seek more than USD 250 million in damages, an injunction and an order for the destruction of models and training sets containing their content.
IndiaIntellectual Property
Legitpro Law
Legitpro Law