Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 AUGUST 2024

Google LLC V. Controller Of Patents

Accures Legal
Explore more from Accures Legal

Google LLC submitted a patent application titled "Managing Instant Messaging Sessions on Multiple Devices" to the Controller of patents and designs on July 13, 2007 and claimed priority from a US patent application.

IndiaIntellectual Property
Vedant Pujari
Vedant Pujari
Ahana Roy Chowdhury
Ahana Roy Chowdhury
Suchika Goel
Suchika Goel
Author LinkedIn connections

(2024 SCC OnLine Del 2317)

Google LLC submitted a patent application titled "Managing Instant Messaging Sessions on Multiple Devices" to the Controller of patents and designs on July 13, 2007 and claimed priority from a US patent application. The application disclosed the feature for transferring instant messaging sessions concurrently between devices and a user preference to mirror sessions while in an idle/away state.

The Controller issued a First Examination Report dated 25th November, 2014 citing three prior art documents listed below and raised the objections of lack of novelty and inventive step under Section 3(k) of the Act. Other objections regarding insufficiency of disclosure, lack of clarity, and other procedural issues were also held.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Copy, Right? ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

When an artificial intelligence system is trained on copyrighted news content, and later answers a user’s question using what it learned, has the law been broken? On 24th July 2026, the Delhi High Court answered that question, at least for now. In ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Justice Amit Bansal declined to grant an interim injunction against OpenAI, holding, on a prima facie, interim stage view, that the company’s use of ANI’s news content to train its large language models (“LLMs”) falls within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957
IndiaIntellectual Property
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

AI Training Data, Copyright Risk And Commercial Liability: What Businesses Need To Know

On 8 October 2026, USA Today Co. and its affiliated newspaper companies, which publish 19 titles including USA Today, the Detroit Free Press and The Arizona Republic, sued seven OpenAI entities in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that OpenAI copied their journalism to train its models, stripped identifying information from it, and now uses those models to give ChatGPT users summaries that substitute for the original reporting. The publishers seek more than USD 250 million in damages, an injunction and an order for the destruction of models and training sets containing their content.
IndiaIntellectual Property
Legitpro Law
Legitpro Law