Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 SEPTEMBER 2016

Entering India National Phase With Lesser Claims –A Step Ahead By IPO

S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices
Contributor
S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices is a full-service law firm headquartered in Delhi NCR. The firm has 300+...

View firm profile
Explore more from S&A Law Offices

Patent Amendment Rules 2016 as published on 16 May 2016 by the Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry have brought many positive changes in the procedure for Patent Grant in India.

IndiaIntellectual Property
Suchi Rai
Suchi Rai
Author LinkedIn connections

Patent Amendment Rules 2016 as published on 16 May 2016 by the Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry {Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion} has brought many positive changes in the procedure for Patent Grant in India. The amended Rules make an effort to restructure the patent procedures with an important objective of reducing the pendency time and providing other benefits to the applicants.

There are many important amendments including but not limited to:

  • Reduction in time period for filing response to FER
  • Remote Hearing, Restriction on adjournments
  • Claim deletion at National Phase Entry
  • No extension of 31 months for National Phase Entry
  • Sequence Listing Maximum Official fees

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Copy, Right? ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

When an artificial intelligence system is trained on copyrighted news content, and later answers a user’s question using what it learned, has the law been broken? On 24th July 2026, the Delhi High Court answered that question, at least for now. In ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Justice Amit Bansal declined to grant an interim injunction against OpenAI, holding, on a prima facie, interim stage view, that the company’s use of ANI’s news content to train its large language models (“LLMs”) falls within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957
IndiaIntellectual Property
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

AI Training Data, Copyright Risk And Commercial Liability: What Businesses Need To Know

On 8 October 2026, USA Today Co. and its affiliated newspaper companies, which publish 19 titles including USA Today, the Detroit Free Press and The Arizona Republic, sued seven OpenAI entities in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that OpenAI copied their journalism to train its models, stripped identifying information from it, and now uses those models to give ChatGPT users summaries that substitute for the original reporting. The publishers seek more than USD 250 million in damages, an injunction and an order for the destruction of models and training sets containing their content.
IndiaIntellectual Property
Legitpro Law
Legitpro Law
Article

Understanding Forgery And Use Of A Forged Document

“Commercial disputes being given a criminal colour” is a routine issue faced by criminal courts across the country, and the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has also quashed several criminal complaints pertaining to commercial/civil claims for that reason. It is important to note that, in such criminal complaints, the usual allegations involve offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and the use of forged documents.
IndiaCriminal Law
S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices