Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 SEPTEMBER 2008

Chipping The Jurisdiction Issue

Simple pleasures sometimes invite a steaming brawl. The perfect example of such a scenario is the application for Special Leave to Appeal [K. Narayanan and Anr. v. S Murali, Civil Appeal Nos. 4480-4481 of 2002] that came forth the Supreme Court, involving manufacturers and sellers of Banana Chips. The appeal lies from the decision of the High Court of Madras.

IndiaIntellectual Property

Simple pleasures sometimes invite a steaming brawl. The perfect example of such a scenario is the application for Special Leave to Appeal [K. Narayanan and Anr. v. S Murali, Civil Appeal Nos. 4480-4481 of 2002] that came forth the Supreme Court, involving manufacturers and sellers of Banana Chips. The appeal lies from the decision of the High Court of Madras.

Narayanan had applied for a trademark registration in1999 in respect of A-ONE, and the same remains pending. In 2000, a suit at the Court of the District Judge of Coimbatore was filed against Narayanan, seeking an injunction to restrain Narayanan from passing off their goods using the trade mark A-ONE. The said suit was dismissed and Narayanan moved to the High Court of Madras. It was only in 2000, that Murali applied for a trademark in A-ONE, claiming to be a user all over India. While the High Court granted leave to sue earlier, the learned

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from