Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2019

CASE STUDY: Agarwal Deokinandan Gopiram vs Jagdamba Textiles Pvt Ltd

S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices
Contributor
S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices is a full-service law firm headquartered in Delhi NCR. The firm has 300+...

View firm profile
Explore more from S&A Law Offices

Applicant applied for patent in year 2005, Patent no. (2135483) granted on July 06, 2009. Patent is for a machine used for fabric dyeing.

IndiaIntellectual Property

R/APPEAL NO. 38 of 2019

Patent Applicant/ Plaintiff: Agarwal Deokinandan Gopiram

Respondent/Defendant: Jagdamba Textiles Pvt Ltd.

Decision on: February 25, 2019

Background: Applicant applied for patent in year 2005, Patent no. (2135483) granted on July 06, 2009. Patent is for a machine used for fabric dyeing.

Proceedings under Additional district judge: Patent Applicant filed a case against unauthorized use of patent to which respondent tried to distinguish the working of 2 machines. The additional judge ruled in favor of the respondent. To which applicant filed an appeal in Ahmedabad high court.

Appeal: Applicant stated that the invention is exclusively associated with them and being in the same trade, Respondent shall no doubt be well aware of the invention of the said machine and yet they have copied the invention. Therefore, a legal notice was served upon the respondents to cease and desist from using the said patented machine. Applicant also added

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from