Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 DECEMBER 2024

Balancing Intellectual Property Enforcement: Lessons From Arun Kumar v. State Of Punjab

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

The Punjab and Haryana High Court's judgment in Arun Kumar v. State of Punjab and Another, delivered by Justice Karamjit Singh, highlights the challenges in enforcing intellectual property laws.

IndiaIntellectual Property

Authored By: G S Shrinithi

Neutral Citation No.: 2024:PHHC:155158

The Punjab and Haryana High Court's judgment in Arun Kumar v. State of Punjab and Another, delivered by Justice Karamjit Singh, highlights the challenges in enforcing intellectual property laws. It demarcates copyright law and trademark law. This landmark ruling addresses the misuse of intellectual property provisions and procedural shortcomings in enforcement. The court in this case dismissed the charges, highlighting the need for proper interpretation of intellectual property law in India.

Factual Background

In this case there were allegations against Arun Kumar, who was accused of manufacturing and selling garments under a counterfeit label of the popular brand Puma. Based on a complaint received from Puma, the police raided Arun Kumar's premise where they found counterfeit goods and arrested him. An FIR was registered against him under Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957. In

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from