Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 NOVEMBER 2019

Put-Option Holders: Financial Creditors Under The IBC?

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
Contributor
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas is India’s largest full-service law firm, with over 1000 lawyers,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

In its recent judgment in the case of Jignesh Shah v. Union of India (Jignesh Shah), a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court set aside the NCLAT judgment in the case of Pushpa Shah v. IL&FS ...

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

In its recent judgment in the case of Jignesh Shah v. Union of India1 (Jignesh Shah), a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court set aside the NCLAT judgment in the case of Pushpa Shah v. IL&FS Financial Services Limited2 (NCLAT Judgment) along with the original judgment of the NCLT3 (NCLT Judgment and, together, La-Fin Judgments). The NCLT Judgment and the NCLAT Judgment had rejected the corporate debtor's objection in relation to the claim being time barred and initiated corporate insolvency resolution process on the basis that a put option holder may be treated as a "financial creditor" under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).

Factual Background

The appeal in the case of Jignesh Shah was filed by the shareholders of La-Fin Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. (La-Fin) assailing the order of the NCLT (upheld by the NCLAT) admitting an application filed by IL&FS Financial Services Ltd. (IFIN) under Section 7 of the IBC to initiate the corporate insolvency

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from