Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 OCTOBER 2019

Constitiutional Validity Of Second Proviso Of Section 5(1) Of PMLA

Thus, these Writ Petitions were consolidated before the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi.

IndiaGovernment, Public Sector

By

Vijay Pal Dalmia, Advocate

Supreme Court of India & Delhi High Court

Email id: [email protected]

Mobile No.: +91 9810081079

Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vpdalmia/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vpdalmia

Twitter: @vpdalmia

The Common factor among writ petitions, before the High Court of Delhi, (titled Aprajita Kumari and Ors. vs. Joint Director, Enforcement Directorate and Ors. Reported at http://lobis.nic.in/ddir/dhc/SMD/judgement/15-01-2018/SMD11012018CW30082016.pdf / MANU/DE/0106/2018), under Article 226 of the Constitution of India (Costitution), filed by petitioners was the prayer for declaring second proviso of section 5(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act,2002 ultra vires of Article 14.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

© 2026, Vaish Associates Advocates,
All rights reserved
Advocates, 1st & 11th Floors, Mohan Dev Building 13, Tolstoy Marg New Delhi-110001 (India).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in this article are solely of the authors of this article.

See more popular content from