Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JUNE 2015

Arbitrations With The State: Time Is Of The Essence!

Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Contributor
Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal is a leading full-service Indian law firm, founded in 2008, providing comprehensive...

View firm profile
Explore more from Phoenix Legal

The dispute between the Union of India through the Indian Railways and the Respondent arose in relation to the performance of a contract for construction of a rail bridge across the River Ganga near Digha Ghat, Patna.

IndiaGovernment, Public Sector

Arbitration proceedings arising from contracts with government departments are more often than not, a quagmire of inordinate delays, huge costs and frequent visits to the court seeking intervention. The Supreme Court of India, in a recently reported decision in Union of India and others vs. Uttar Pradesh State Bridge Corporation Limited (2015) 2 SCC 52 has taken the government to task and held that inordinate delays in conducting arbitration proceedings and the inability of the tribunal to perform its functions are grounds for termination of mandate of the arbitral tribunal.

What is more interesting however is that the apex court has gone one step further and held that while appointing a new tribunal under Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) the court need not follow the procedure prescribed under the arbitration agreement between the parties.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from