Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 APRIL 2021

Inter-Se Priorities Between Creditors Not Respected In Liquidation Waterfall - A Misplaced Presumption?

The NCLAT in Technology Development Board v. Mr. Anil Goel ("Technology Development Board") has dealt with a complex issue of applicability of inter-se priorities between secured creditors...

IndiaFinance and Banking

1. Introduction

The NCLAT in Technology Development Board v. Mr. Anil Goel1 ("Technology Development Board") has dealt with a complex issue of applicability of inter-se priorities between secured creditors in liquidation and first and second ranking creditors. NCLAT has, respectfully, lost sight of the fact that its judgment will now create confusion and chaos in banking and finance sector, which relies heavily on intercreditor and priorities of ranking. This is a fundamental tenant of banking law globally. This article analyses the impact of NCLAT's judgment.

2. Brief Facts and Background

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("Code") provides 2 options to creditors to enforce their security interest. First, relinquish the security interest to the liquidation estate and receive from sale proceeds in accordance with the waterfall mechanism under section 53 of the Code ("Relinquishment"). Secondly, enforcing and realising their security interest outside

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The above is a generic analysis and should not be regarded as a substitute for specific advice based on the facts of a client’s objectives and specific commercial agreements reached. Please do reach out to us at [email protected] for any queries.

See more popular content from