Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 APRIL 2016

Mining Leases - Subsistence, Renewal And Deemed Extension

Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Contributor
Khaitan & Co.

Khaitan & Co.

Founded in 1911, Khaitan & Co is a heritage law firm that has been a trusted adviser to leading...

View firm profile
Explore more from Khaitan & Co.

The Court in this Judgment has exhaustively addressed the issue of legitimacy of claims raised by the mining leaseholders to recommence mining operations...

IndiaEnergy and Natural Resources

The much awaited and anticipated judgment in the tagged matters of Common Cause v Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (Civil) No 114 of 2014] and Prafulla Samantra & Anr v Union of India & Ors [Writ Petition (Civil) No 194 of 2014] regarding the mining of iron ore in the State of Orissa, was pronounced by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Court) on 4 April 2016 (Judgment).

The Court in this Judgment has exhaustively addressed the issue of legitimacy of claims raised by the mining leaseholders to recommence mining operations, in furtherance of the order dated 16 May 2014, whereby the Court, on account of absence of clearances/approvals/consent from concerned authorities, had restrained 102 mining leaseholders from carrying on any mining operations. The intricate question to be considered by the Court, was whether the applicants, seeking revocation of the above-mentioned order of restraint/suspension, retain a valid mining lease (ML) and a consequent subsisting

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from