Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JANUARY 2026

The Cockpit Verdict: Redefining 'Workman'

Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Contributor
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants

Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants

• Full-service law firm established in 2004 by Mr. Vipul Maheshwari, headquartered in New Delhi,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants

The Division Bench of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, comprising Justice Anil Kshetarpal and Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, delivered a significant judgment...

IndiaEmployment and HR

The Division Bench of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, comprising Justice Anil Kshetarpal and Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, delivered a significant judgment in the case of King Airways v. Captain Pritam Singh & Ors. (LPA 142/2013 & connected matters), dated December 11, 2025. This verdict decisively settled a long-standing jurisprudential controversy regarding the classification of high-income professionals, specifically Pilots-in-Command (PIC), under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (ID Act). The Hon'ble Court was seized with multiple Letters  Patent Appeals challenging conflicting orders. The primary legal conundrum was whether a Pilot-in-Command, who draws a substantial salary and exercises statutory authority over an aircraft and its crew, falls within the definition of a “workman” under Section 2(s) of the ID Act or is excluded as a “supervisor” under Section 2(s)(iv). The judgment offers a comprehensive analysis of statutory interpretation, distinguishing

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from