Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 APRIL 2025

Electronica India Ltd vs Electronica Hitech Machines Pvt Ltd

Aarna Law
Explore more from Aarna Law

This case centres on two commercial miscellaneous petitions (CMP No. 47 of 2022 and CMP No. 51 of 2022) filed by Electronica India Ltd against the Trademark Registry in Mumbai.

IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
Aarna Law
Aarna Law

Decided on 15. 04. 24 by the Bombay High Court

Electronica India Ltd Vs. Electronica Hitech Machines Pvt Ltd & Ors

024 SCC OnLine SC 1190 | CMP No. 47 of 2022 and CMP No. 51 of 2022

Background

This case centres on two commercial miscellaneous petitions (CMP No. 47 of 2022 and CMP No. 51 of 2022) filed by Electronica India Ltd against the Trademark Registry in Mumbai. The petitions challenged the Registry's decision to recognise Electronica Hitech Machines Pvt. Ltd. as the new owner of the trademarkELECTRONICAafter the Respondent submitted Form 24.

Electronica Hitech Machines Pvt. Ltd. (the Respondent)filed two Form-24 applications to claim ownership of trademarks 1313395 and 1313396, which were initially registered to a partnership firm called M/s Electronica in 2004. In 2011, the partners converted the partnership into a company under the Companies Act, with all partners becoming directors of Electronica Hitech Machines Pvt Ltd. The Respondent argued

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

CCPS In India: Why Compulsorily Convertible Preference Shares Remain Central To Venture Capital And M&A Transactions

Compulsorily Convertible Preference Shares (CCPS) remain one of the most widely used instruments for venture capital and private equity investments in Indian companies. Their appeal lies in the ability to combine equity classification with negotiated economic and governance protections. But CCPS are not governed by a single, standalone statutory framework. Their legal treatment is instead shaped by the Companies Act, FEMA and foreign investment rules, tax law, and, where applicable, SEBI regulations.
IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
King, Stubb & Kasiva
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Article

FCRA Amendment Rules, 2026: Key Changes And Practical Implications

AZB & Partners provides important disclaimers regarding the nature and purpose of their website, clarifying that no solicitation or advertising has occurred and that the information is provided solely at the user's request. The firm outlines the limitations of the website content and emphasizes that accessing it does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Users are informed about their responsibilities when using the site and the firm's intellectual property rights over the content.
IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
AZB & Partners
AZB & Partners