Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 NOVEMBER 2023

A Compliance Officer Doesn't Need Prying Eyes

In a recent ruling, the Hon'ble Securities Appellate Tribunal ("SAT") has absolved a company and its compliance officer for wrongful disclosure made to the stock exchanges.

IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law

In a recent ruling1, the Hon'ble Securities Appellate Tribunal ("SAT") has absolved a company and its compliance officer for wrongful disclosure made to the stock exchanges. The ruling was based on the argument that the misinformation originated from a Key Managerial Personnel (KMP) within the company.

The matter also concerned an allegation against the KMP for trading when in possession of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information ("UPSI"). The UPSI in question was the financial results for the quarter ending 31 March 2016. Also in contention was the date on which the alleged UPSI came into existence.

Summary

The KMP was the Managing Director (MD) of the company and an 'insider'. He transferred shares of the company on 04 May 2016 to another entity, for which he received consideration almost a year later. He disclosed this to the company and the compliance officer on 09 May 2016 as an encumbrance upon these shares and not a sale, and consequently a disclosure

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from