Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 AUGUST 2026

100% Pure” Or Procedurally Impure? The Dabur-FSSAI Dispute

Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)
Explore more from Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)

When India's food regulator ordered Dabur to stop selling products labeled "100% Pure," the Delhi High Court intervened with an interim stay. The case raises fundamental questions about how absolute advertising claims should be regulated and whether prohibitory action can be taken without adequate procedural safeguards.

IndiaConsumer Protection

Introduction

“100% Pure” sounds reassuring. For a consumer, it may suggest that a product is natural, completely pure and free from anything that might compromise its quality. But in advertising law, absolute claims invite close scrutiny: can the advertiser substantiate the claim, and is the overall consumer impression accurate? These questions came before the Delhi High Court in a dispute between Dabur India Limited and the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI).

What makes the case particularly relevant for brand owners and advertising counsel is the tension between two concerns: protecting consumers from potentially misleading claims and ensuring that regulatory action follows fair process.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from